I hope this site becomes a place for dialogue and the exchange of ideas. I want to raise consciousness about issues and stories that don't always make the headlines. I believe that global awareness makes a person smarter and ultimately more human. I'm grossed out by what some "news" outlets masquerade as news. It seems that so many of these outlets cover international stories only when there's catastrophe or war. It's a shame.

There are so many fascinating people doing important things out there. As a journalist I've been blessed with the opportunity to travel all over the world. I want this to be a place for everyone to find out about people and organizations that I've encountered that are doing good work. I'd like to share some of my experiences and invite all of you to share your thoughts and stories you think should be told. Let's expand our horizons together!

North Korea
A trip to one of the most isolated countries on the planet
Child Trafficking: India
In India, there are millions of children who are being forced to work as slaves.
Inside Maximum Security
Unprecedented access to SAC -- a maximum-security men's prison.
Female Suicide Bombers
Increasingly, women are using their bodies to deliver an attack.
Meth: The World's Most Dangerous Drug
An exploration the impact meth is having on societies in Portland, Omaha and Bangkok
Click for more topics 
Blog Archive
There is certainly no shortage of issues that should demand our attention, but here’s a list of some that I think are of vital importance. Please share with me your thoughts on these and issues that are of concern to you.
start new topic
1
Topics
Latest Post
latest post by
10/20/2008 at 2:59am
latest post by
10/19/2008 at 2:42am
latest post by
10/10/2008 at 7:24pm
latest post by
10/02/2008 at 10:26am
start new topic
1
RSS Feed
August 18, 2008 2:32 AM  (go back to main view)
Giving public schools a chance...

Many Los Angeles residents will recall hearing about the race riot that broke out at Locke High School in Watts that involved 600 some-odd students a couple months ago. According to school administrators, the news story was totally blown out of proportion, but nevertheless, Locke has had the reputation of being the worst. This summer, the Green Dot charter school system took over control of this reputed worst school in L.A. Has it already changed? Well, I spent the day with a new principle and several administrators and we literally went door to door in one of the roughest communities in Los Angeles to engage students, meet parents and invite everyone to participate. Upon answering the door and seeing school staff, the first reaction amongst all of the families was "what's wrong?" After explaining that their objective was to invite families to take part in the process, administrators were met with smiles and some tears. I must admit, it was refreshing to feel hopeful about an L.A. public school.

From the get go, Green Dot transforms the look of the campus. When school starts, it will no longer look like a dismal prison and look more like a university. The whole school is broken up into a series of mini academies with separate principles and rules. This reduces class size and the teacher to student ratio. The academies are literally divided up on the campus. Kids eat lunch on their own little campus and lunch period is staggered. Previously, the entire school population--thousands of kids--would have lunch in the middle of campus with insufficient adult supervision. How could fights not break out? Imagine every USC student out on campus having lunch at the exact same time.

A dress code of black, collared shirts and khaki pants are imposed, which was apparently welcomed at Locke since there have been so many problems related to gangs and gang colors and attire. And all teachers have to re-apply for their jobs. Of the over 100 teachers at Locke, 40 kept their jobs (some chose not to re-apply), and they hired 80 more. Green Dot uses the allocated public funds and allows each academy principle and staff to use it accordingly based on need. Green Dot founder Steve Barr told me that 40% of a public school’s budget goes to overhead. Green Dot eliminates the overhead and channels the monies to paying teachers more and figuring out how to use the money in an effective, non- wasteful way. It’s not rocket science, it’s about efficiency.

“The way to fix schools, “ Barr says, “is to get rid of private schools.” He went on to say, “can you imagine if affluent parents had to send their kids to Locke?” He exclaimed. “It’d be different school.”

Green Dot and its strategy are worth reading about: www.Greendot.org. My experience at Locke was hugely moving. I met the assistant principle of one of the new Locke schools, Zeus Cubias. Cubias has done everything from teaching math to coaching girls soccer at Locke for 12 years. When Green Dot first appeared on the scene, Cubias felt insulted. Born in the surrounding community, Cubias assailed Barr for thinking he knew what the community needed. After spending significant time with him and learning of Green Dot’s formula, Cubias was sold and has become one its biggest advocates.

“For the first time in a long time, I feel motivated,” Cubias said. “I admit, I was starting to get complacent, we all were.” He then broke down in tears, “I am so thankful that someone is believing in us and our kids…I want to prove everyone wrong about us.”

I've gotten into fierce debates with dear friends over public vs. private schools. While I totally understand that parents only want what's best and safest for their kids, but I also realize that in America we need to think off all kids as "our kids."the kids of today will be the future leaders, business owners, and welfare recipients of tomorrow. Why don't we want the best and safest for all of our kids?

All eyes are going to be on Locke High School and Green Dot when thousands of kids return this fall. If they succeed, the Green Dot model may become a national one. The good news, the bar has been set pretty low--Locke can’t get much worse.

Post Tags:
Related Posts:
We'll be right back.(18 days ago - 11 Comments)
Please check out the following link...(33 days ago - 4 Comments)
Greetings from Alaska!(37 days ago - 4 Comments)
Conscious eating...(40 days ago - 23 Comments)
Still here!(48 days ago - 11 Comments)
Blog Comments (6):
Posted by Karen Jone... on August 25, 2008 1:43 AM
There are too many educated people in this society with B.A.s and Master’s degrees that not only don’t give a hoot about the next guy, but will use their position of power to exploit, defame, and oppress the person with a smaller title, and a lower salary. The problem is they are not in the service of raising up those below them. The reasons being is that their B.A.s and their intellectual knowledge has not given them true knowledge which is the understanding of the heart and soul of every man and woman, and child. The higher one goes the more they are responsible to be involved in the welfare of that majority below them. Their job is to raise others up emotionally, spiritually, and financially, and the opposite has been occurring.

We have politicians, talk show hosts, celebrities, wealthy spiritual gurus, and CEOs that take and take, and never give back. They throw out charity money, to make themselves feel better, but people are not charity cases. The majority of people have hearts, minds, and brains, passions, and talents just like anyone else, and they only want an economic environment where there is fair an honest play. The job whatever it is should goes to the person who can do the job in an honest, conscious way and who will create a sincere environment of good will, not to someone because they have a B.A. from Harvard, and will profit the company at everyone else’s expense. A bully is a bully regardless of his/her Harvard or Yale education or his expertise. A power hungry human being that oppresses and neglects the rights and liberties of the people below him is a problem, not an asset. Regardless of what hi/her school credentials are.
Americans need to stop meditating so much, and forgiving others, and start forgiving themselves. The majority is supposed to keep a watchful eye on our government and corporations and make sure that those in power are serving the majority, not just the wealthy CEOs and celebrities, and politicians.
Our corporations, government, media spiritual gurus are run by narcissistic greedy, selfish egos who are never satisfied with what they have or earn. Most of these people have B.A.s and Master’s degrees, big titles, money and power but they are still not satisfied because they are not aware of love and they keep trying to fill the emptiness they feel with self-grandization, and self-glorification. They always want more and more and more, and seek more and more at the expense of the well-fair of the majority. Those who are more conscious and the targets of these bullies are brain-washed by the spiritual community to forgive and tolerate, and just give these people bullies love. When you allow another person to violate you emotionally, physically, and financially – that is not love. When the Human Resource of a corporation or company does not address with firmness the situation of an employee being bullied or harassed by a boss or co-worker , and tolerates it, denies it and looks the other way, then that is a double violation on the employee being harassed and bullied. And I’m sure the person in charge of Human Resources has a B.A. or even a Master’s degree but they are ignorant - there is no intelligence there at all. The employer doing the bullying may also have a B.A. So what. These people have no real education at all if they do not protect others and the rights of others. And Yes, they must even demand a safe collaborative environment, and one of good will and equality.

With all this education we are still producing a society of people who operate like pigs and animals. We can say that poverty and lack of education produces the same type of person, but for different reasons. Unreasonable and intolerable lack and poverty will always produce fear and anger, and animal behavior, but on the other end of the spectrum, educated and the well to do, don’t have any consciousness either because they refuse to give to those who lack or serve those who lack so that they won’t lack anymore. Rather the educated and well to do are still so lacking in self-esteem and peace of mind and their own divinity that they have to keep taking and taking and trying to fill themselves up with more and more and they take from the majority who have so much less than them. But they are never satisfied, because their so called education, doesn’t teach them how to love themselves, and so they don’t know how to love another. The ability to see another as themselves, and treat another as they would like to be treated is not taught in formal education. This is why formal quality education will not solve the problem. Education with consciousness can solve the problem. But education itself is an empty vessel.
Our offices are full of bullies, our school system, and our churches, and our government with people who have B.A.s and Master Degrees.

Education is only a small piece of the puzzle. It is a tool, and only one tool, and not the answer. People need to learn how to love, appreciate, respect, and up-lift one another. Without that kind of education formal education is useless, and so it has been proven as we look at the state of our nation in every area. There are just as many people right now with B.A.s who are out of work, as those who are talented and experienced in the work force who don’t have B.A.s. and are out of work as well.

There are now just many people who have B.A.s and Masters Degrees who are out of work now who have families to feed and mortgages to pay, and they can’t. We have for many years been tolerating an unethical economic environment where only the greedy, the liars, the cheaters and the bullies and the abusers win at the economic game. So education although important for the poor, the focus on it, is really also used as a way to avoid the real problem which is excessive corruption in business and government.




Posted by Mr. Chardo... on August 24, 2008 4:20 PM
Lisa Ling come with us (the staff of Animo Locke II) on home visits around South L.A. We were very happy to see her so that we could tell a positive story about the community. There are tons of stereotypes about this community and school, but the reality is the vast majority of students want what any student wants, good classes, good teachers, and a proper eduction. We hope to provide that at Locke!
Posted by  on August 18, 2008 11:51 PM
are we talking about mba's or locke? anyway, i am very excited to see how greendot does with locke high school. as a former teacher at jordan high school (also in watts), there were so many obstacles to improving the school--bad/apathetic teachers being one. (and the union makes it next to impossible to get rid of a bad teacher!) it sure is telling when only 40 of the over 100 teachers get hired back. the ones who didn't reapply most likely knew they wouldn't get the job anyway. very sad. but, very good for the new school!

i hope this is a step in the right direction for schools in the inner city. i look forward to watching your special on it.
Posted by Karen Jone... on August 17, 2008 8:45 PM
There are Americans out of work who are skilled, talented and educated and with job experience, but now they need a B.A. to get back into the work force doint the same mid-level work they did before ? That's crazy. And specifically a B.A. in Business. That's not possible for most people to go back to school now - they need to get back to work and feed themselves and their families, pay rent, mortgages, save money to send their own kids to college.
Posted by Karen Jone... on August 17, 2008 1:14 PM
There's still not much on the jobsites for a job, and if we come across something that one has experience in, the recruiter and company want you to have a B.A. - not just a four year degree in anything, but a four year degree in Business. So the same job one has been doing for five or ten years such as inside corporate sales now requires a B.A. Even though one has the skills and experience in this field, and is ready, able and willing to work. Now employers-- they require a B.A. And not just a B.A but a B.A. specifically in business, and not just specifically a B.A in business but a B. A. in Business from an Ivy League School. An Ivy League School, ooh, we should all be so lucky to a have a daddy that’s rich and a mommy that’s good looking. Sounds like any decent paying jobs available now are only available for rich kids with rich parents.

They pulled this B.A. requirement in the 1980's when the economy went bad during Senior Bush administration. Suddenly a secretary and or administrative assistant could NOT get a job in that field unless they had a B.A. and a B.A. specifically in Business – Why does a person need suddenly need a four year business degree to be a secretary, especially since they already have the experience and skills, and have been successfully doing that job for a few years now. Not to mention that secretaries may need to raise kids, and feed mouths. Some of those people went into sales at that time in the 1980’s because sales jobs at the time did not require a B.A. like secretarial positions suddenly required.

But now with this economy and the Junior Bush Administration, they are now requiring a B.A for inside and outside corporate sales or any sales. Inside corporate sales in NYC average pay is $42-75,000 a year. Why should someone suddenly need a B.A. to make the same or less money to land the same job they have been doing and were successful at? They always change the rules. You would think with a job candidate who has been doing a particular job for a while, and gaining the experience for a number of years, and bringing that maturity to the position someone would want to hire them.
If it's obvious they can do the job well, so why not just give them the same opportunity to land another job, especially if they are a point in their life where they may have children and a mortgage and are without the B.A. and a B.A. specifically in Business, and not everyone was able to go to an Ivy League school. If they never needed the B.A. before to do the job well to begin with, why do they need it now to get even a job interview? These recruiters and companies are pushing people who are in the middle of raising families and needing to pay mortgages out of the job market again with these strict criteria.

They are also demanding a receptionist have a B.A. Check out this advertisement for receptionist – requires a four year B.A. for receptionist work and at only $35,000 a year. If Someone spends that much time and money to get a B.A. they would expect to have a decent paying entry level job out of school that pays them according to their skill and education, not a receptionist position at only $35,000 a year.
--------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- --------------------- Date: 2008-08-14, 5:43PM EDT

We are seeking a Polished, professional receptionist for an immediate and fantastic opportunity with a Real Estate giant for a great temp to perm opportunity. Tremendous growth opportunity position!! Must have BA or BS degree, MS word and Excel skills, excellent phone manor and stellar communication skills. This is front desk reception in large corporate offices. Must be comfortable dealing with very high level clients. Recent college grads welcome! Please email all resuumes in a Word doc for immediate consideration!


Compensation: $35K
-------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- --------

Also, these recruiters and employers are always asking job candidates “Why have you been out of work for so long?” And they ask with a very judgmental attitude. I think to myself don't they watch the news on TV or the internet. Why is there such denial about what is going on? They are recruiters, and they know exactly what is going on and they pretend they don't. They are very judgmental towards job candidates that have been out of work for more than four months or longer --- which only puts everyone out of work even longer – and many Americans have been out of work a year or more at this point. So I don't know what the point is. If people are willing and able to work and are excellent candidates with experience, so why do the recruiters have such a judgmental attitude towards the candidate who has had a hard time finding a job in this economy after they have been laid-off. You would think that recruiters and employers would acknowledge the situation, and want to help Americans get back to work. And what’s with the B.A for people who have been in the job market for a reasonable amount of time already clearly able to do a job that does not require them to have a B.A.to do it, because they have, in fact, been doing the job in the recent past. And what are these job candidates supposed to do now, stop paying their rent, or mortgage, and stop feeding their families and go back to school for four more years. And even if these people have a four year degree, if it’s not specifically a B.A – they are pushed out of the job market. And why does it have to be an Ivy League school for mid level positions that these job candidates have already been successful at?

People may say to the unemployed white collar, just get a waitress or waitering/server job in a restaurant for now, until the economy changes and there is work in your field, but restaurants require two years experience minimum and they want someone with only NYC restaurant experience in NYC. Now for a white collar person who can’t find a job in their field, not just because there are so few jobs but because they suddenly need a B.A. in business from an Ivy League school to boot-- this is not good news at all – as far trying to switch over to waiting tables in a restaurant to keep a roof over their head and food on the table for themselves and their families, and pay high rent, mortgages, outrageous gas prices. If we want people to do an honest day’s work, we are going to have to let them.

I know many, many, foreigners here in America on Visas, working for American Companies here in the U.S. and given entry and mid-level jobs that pay $40-75,000 a year -- with full health insurance coverage, bonuses, and relocation packages. Why were those jobs not given to Americans? They are entry level and mid-level positions, such as secretary, administrative assistant, management, and sales. Why do these jobs go to people out of the country who are brought here on Visas, and leaving Americans without jobs.
One woman who works for a huge company in New York says “I don’t understand it. They hired someone here from another country, and the company pays $12,000 per year to sponsor his Visa. He is in a management position and according to everyone that works with him, he doing a lousy job. Rather than let him go and send him back to his country they are shuffling him off from one department to another just to get rid of him in their department. They keep sponsoring him to stay in this country; they keep him employed there for over a year already, and no one in the company is satisfied with his work, and they don’t let him go. They just try to get rid of him by pushing him off to another department. The guy has a B.A. but he’s useless – no one is impressed with him at all, and he is only in everyone’s way, so he gets shuffled from one department to another, rather than sending him back to where he came from.” If they let him go, that management position could go to a very talented, passionate, ethical and skilled American who needs to pay their bills, feed their kids pay their mortgage, and get back on their feet if they have been unemployed whether the American has a B.A. in business or not. As long as he/she can do a good job, and is an asset to their employer.

The woman continued to say “not all employees on visas’ working at the company are as incompetent as him, but many are – too many are incompetent, and they have B.A.s. The jobs should be given to those who can do the job, and are willing to do the job, and not because someone has a B.A. or a Masters, and especially not someone from another country who is incompetent, when so many skilled, talented, and experienced Americans are out of work, who are willing able, and ready to work and also need the job.”

I know of one American man, who because he is still single, moved back with his parents, and was able to go back to school and get his B.A. in order to compete in this bad job market, and he acquired his B.A.s over a year ago, and he still can’t find a job. He probably cannot acquire a job for two reasons – 1. The school he went to was not Ivy League, and two because he is not a foreigner, he is a U.S Citizen. He is wondering why he bothered to go back to school at all, and go into debt for more schooling, just to look for a job with the same pay or more likely less pay than he was making before doing the same job. He is not getting the jobs anyway because the jobs are going to people outside the country, who are brought here by American companies and their visas are sponsored by American companies. Americans who are out of work and able and willing to work, and who have the experience also to do the job should have the opportunity to fill these positions first, before those who are non U.S. Citizens.

Recruiters and companies in America need to look at the person. They need to look at the individual – is this person skilled, talented, and do they have the experience, or can they learn quickly. Do they like what they do, can they contribute to the company, are they collaborative, and are they innovative, creative, and resourceful. Do they have confidence, work ethic, willing, able, and interested in working Are they intelligent whether they have a B.A or not, and yes, are they a U.S. Citizen because such U.S. citizens have the right to work, pay their bills, taxes, and feed themselves and their families – especially when it comes to entry level and mid-level positions that don’t require a B.A. to actually do the job if they have all of the above qualities. B.A. should be required for Doctors and Lawyers, and people who aspire to become V.P.s of companies they work for, but this B.A requirement for entry level and people already in the workforce paying their dues by learning on the job and already succeeding and already creating a track record – this B.A. should not be a requirement. This unreasonable requirement is pushing most people out of the job market by such jobs of administration, sales, management etc. and is discrimatory.

And requiring Ivy League schools degrees for such jobs is even more discriminatory.

Also companies should try to keep in mind that there are people from crime ridden poverty stricken backgrounds and neighborhoods who at one time just had to take a job, start at the bottom, and they worked their way up to mid-level management, or administrative assistant in order to break free from their oppressive backgrounds. . They could not afford to go to college. Or maybe they managed to get some college and have an Associate’s Degree. Or maybe they have a four year degree but it might be in Liberal Arts, not necessarily business. The point is they did not hang out on the corner with the friends in high school and take drugs or deal drugs like their peers. They may have taken the higher road. People from all walks of life have so many various circumstance and situations where they could not get a four-year college degree yet they still are intelligent, and skilled. Now these people are adults perhaps in their late 20’s or early 30’s or 40’s etc. and they are responsible, law-abiding tax-paying citizens – they are adults now perhaps with children of their own to take care of, and they need an income, and have no time or money for college to get a degree to do what they have already been willing and able to do. Maybe they also have mortgages to pay. Companies now requiring these people to have B.A.s in order to get back into the job market is just totally unreasonable, unfair and discrimatory If they are willing, and able to work and they can do the job, they should be able to get the job whether they have a B.A. or not.

Since the B.A. requirement for secretaries back in the mid to late 1980’s, we now have so many secretaries with B.A.s and the majority of them stay secretaries – they just do the same job their mother’s were doing except their mother’s only needed a high school diploma. The argument is that with a B.A. a secretary can move up the corporate ladder. Few do though, and most stay secretaries and for various reasons. One reason they have children and they may not have interest time to do it all. Another reason not all people who do an honest day’s work want to climb the corporate ladder, they just want to do what they do well, and honorably which should be enough in this society. Also not everyone wants to be president of the corporation, man or woman – people more often just want to do what they do well, and with honesty, integrity, and be conscious. They are not just contributing their skills but their being – their service, humility, and consciousness to the atmosphere and the job. If they want to be promoted, they can learn enough about the business they are in by being there and participating which is where the real learning is not in a classroom at any Ivy League School. And we can say the same things about management and sales etc.

There is nothing wrong with a B.A. and the more education you can get the better but making it a requirement in this economy is outrageous and discrimatory for entry level and mid-level jobs directed at very talented and skilled people who can be a great asset to the company with or without the B.A. How interested are we really in putting Americans back to work, and strengthening our country and economy.

All this talk about American Citizens not being educated enough – look at all the skilled, talented and educated people who are out of work now – and the jobs are going to foreigners with or without B.A.s and a B.A. doesn’t even mean much as far as talent and work ethic for the jobs that are available.


Posted by pat on August 16, 2008 4:55 PM
It's true. Just because a kid was born into an affluent home, doesn't mean that he or she should be entitled to a better education than other kids. The disparity in education is growing so widely and that is going to hugely impact this country.
RSS Feed
Add a comment
Name
E-mail
E-mail
Password