I hope this site becomes a place for dialogue and the exchange of ideas. I want to raise consciousness about issues and stories that don't always make the headlines. I believe that global awareness makes a person smarter and ultimately more human. I'm grossed out by what some "news" outlets masquerade as news. It seems that so many of these outlets cover international stories only when there's catastrophe or war. It's a shame.

There are so many fascinating people doing important things out there. As a journalist I've been blessed with the opportunity to travel all over the world. I want this to be a place for everyone to find out about people and organizations that I've encountered that are doing good work. I'd like to share some of my experiences and invite all of you to share your thoughts and stories you think should be told. Let's expand our horizons together!

North Korea
A trip to one of the most isolated countries on the planet
Child Trafficking: India
In India, there are millions of children who are being forced to work as slaves.
Inside Maximum Security
Unprecedented access to SAC -- a maximum-security men's prison.
Female Suicide Bombers
Increasingly, women are using their bodies to deliver an attack.
Meth: The World's Most Dangerous Drug
An exploration the impact meth is having on societies in Portland, Omaha and Bangkok
Click for more topics 
Blog Archive
There is certainly no shortage of issues that should demand our attention, but here’s a list of some that I think are of vital importance. Please share with me your thoughts on these and issues that are of concern to you.
start new topic
1
Topics
Latest Post
latest post by
10/20/2008 at 2:59am
latest post by
10/19/2008 at 2:42am
latest post by
10/10/2008 at 7:24pm
latest post by
10/02/2008 at 10:26am
start new topic
1
RSS Feed
June 30, 2008 12:04 PM  (go back to main view)
Let's all get a gun!
I haven't gotten over the shock of the recent SCOTUS decision vis a vis guns and the applause it's receiving on both sides of the ticket. I really wish that someone could help me better understand why guns are held so precious in our country and society. Please enlighten me.
I get the 2nd Amendment and the right to bear arms, but I wonder what our Founding Father's would have thought if they knew that centuries later, more than 10,000 Americans would be killed by guns a year. I wonder what they would think about the fact that a college kid would take assault weapons onto his campus and murder innocent American students. Whether for hunting or self defense, isn't the point of guns to kill?

This issue is one that ignites such passion amongst gun owners and I just want to understand why? They often site the right to form a well armed militia to rise up against the forces of tyranny.

Well shoot, since there seem to be an abundance of these tyrannical forces, I'm thinking of forming a well armed militia to rise up, anyone want to join me? We have to be careful in our planning though as our phones might be wiretapped.
Post Tags:
Related Posts:
We'll be right back.(18 days ago - 11 Comments)
Please check out the following link...(33 days ago - 4 Comments)
Greetings from Alaska!(37 days ago - 4 Comments)
Conscious eating...(40 days ago - 23 Comments)
Still here!(48 days ago - 11 Comments)
Blog Comments (12):
Posted by  on July 04, 2008 3:35 PM
Ms Ling,
I respect your questioning the issue a great deal.
I would like to take a little step back though and prompt you to ask a broader question. Why do we kill so many people?
what is it in our society that allows or prods for such a furious response to any situation?
In countries where gun bans are in place, homicide is not necessarily less of an issue, in Japan or Mexico knives are used, Africa has killed around 5 million people in past decade almost exclusively with the machete.

In Non-firearm homicide rates the US is the first western nation on the list, Americans kill seven times more people, per capita, than Canadians do.
All without using guns.
So if guns go, homicides won't follow. Prison murder rates show that weapon availability won't affect homicide rates in the long run.

It is the moral state that is the cause for the murder, and that should be the issue addressed first, wouldn't you say? Go to the roots...




In 2005 (the most recent year for which data is available), there were 30,694 gun deaths in the U.S:

* 12,352 homicides (40% of all U.S gun deaths),
* 17,002 suicides (55% of all U.S gun deaths),
* 789 unintentional shootings, 330 from legal intervention and 221 from undetermined intent (5% of all U.S gun deaths combined).
-Numbers obtained from CDC National Center for Health Statistics mortality report online, 2008.

55% of gun deaths are suicides.
61% percent of Homicides were commited without the use of firearms.

I do truly believe that guns are not the issue, it is the state of the heart of people. Perhaps if all of the money spent on the 'anti-gun' anything went to helping inner-city youth and loving people nationwide, giving men a sense of purpose and people a sense of hope the issue altogether could go away. Not until a knife can be found, but until a father or mother stops loving and guiding their child.
Your thoughts are welcome, Kenneth
Posted by guest on August 05, 2008 1:12 PM
You are right. But don't you think guns give those people a very convenient tool? Do you think it's easier to kill people with gun or knife? How many people can you kill with gun vs. knife?
Posted by Pam W. on July 04, 2008 12:02 AM
Lisa, I've been trying to figure this out for a long time. And why we are so deeply divided on an issue that effects our children, our families and our safety. Shouldn't the anwser be the less guns the better. I live in DC for 10 years but orginally from a very pro-gun area of rural Pennsylvania. What amazes me is that people in the urban centers, those dealing with the most gun voilence, want handguns banned. People who live in environments where they may have a gun but are never in a situation where they may need to use it, such as a safe small town, believe we should all be able to own one. (sorry to stereotype, but it's my experience true for the most part) I think it is easy for them to say. If we can't completely ban handguns then I hope municipalities will continue to push for regulations and laws to protect their citizens and eventually are able to decide what's best for their own communities.
Posted by Bro. Bartl... on July 02, 2008 4:06 PM
I think gun ownership had a life saving purpose as our country moved to settle the unsettled areas (this is a generalization, not addressing the indigenous population) when not only was law enforcement absent, in most case "law" was absent. A farmer or a rancher had to protect themselves against law breakers, for the nearest sheriff may have been a hundred miles away. So that is the genesis of Americans and firearms. Unlike Europe, America still has vast low populated areas, where even today a homesteader may be hours from the nearest law enforcement agency. And today the law enforcement response to a call for help can range anywhere from minutes, to hours. If one is fortunate enough to live in a town or city with rapid law enforcement response, then perhaps firearms could be restricted there. So the problem with a "black and white" solution, guns or no guns, doesn't address the many issues that are unique to America. Perhaps the most unique, the countless firearms already in the hands of the bad guys, these firearms will remain in their hands, regardless of laws banning firearms.
Bro. Bartleby
http://brobartleby.blogspot.com/

Posted by  on July 01, 2008 6:09 PM
You know, maybe we're not looking at the true root of the problem here. The root may be a glorification of guns. Look at how much you see guns glorified in society. Up here in Wisconsin, it's an annual thing- every time deer season comes along, half the town empties out into the nearest hunting ground. At Wal-Mart, where I work, this past Christmas season one of the displays read "Jingle Bells Shotgun Shells". And this isn't a new thing- pop culture shows a long history of that glorification. Jack Bauer. Dirty Harry. John Wayne. The result is, guns are percieved as "cool", or "manly", and then everyone has to have them and, in addition, use them, and often at that. With that kind of setup, the result is inevitable.

So any tinkering with laws or even attempting to change the Constitution may be futile unless that glorification stops propping things up.
Posted by Jen on July 01, 2008 12:21 PM
I think the second ammendment should be re-evaluated in modern society. We live in a VERY different time than the Founding Fathers did - they didn't live in a time where gun violence takes the lives of thousands of innocent people each year. Look at the US stats compared to other countries - both in terms of the number of guns and the gun-related deaths each year - the figures are astronomical. How many innocent people have to die before it is realized that the right to bear arms should not come before the right to life? The times they are a changing...and the laws should try to keep up!
Posted by Echelon on June 30, 2008 9:23 PM
So are you buying firearms for everyone then, or are we on our own?

I think that whether you like guns or not, you have to realize that the D.C. ban (and the other city bans) are completely unconstitutional - to suspend those rights permanently is simply unacceptable.

http://concealedcampus.org/
Posted by Lisa Ling on July 01, 2008 12:13 AM
I know I know Echelon. But we're not talking about repressing the right to free speech or a speedy trail, we're talking about weapons that take innocent lives. At a certain point, might we consider re-evaluating the Second Amendment and put into a modern context? How far are we going to let this go in this country? How many people have to die?
Posted by Lisa Ling on July 01, 2008 6:44 AM
I respect that.

But I only see two options to that, really. Suspending ownership rights, or allowing them. And I would rather the people have the right to own firearms in order to defend themselves, than the law-abiding citizens not be allowed to have them, and thus only the "bad" guys would have the firearms.

I'm not up on my gun violence statistics (namely because you hear different numbers from different sides), but I'm willing to bet there was still a substantial number of injuries/deaths from firearms in D.C., for a place that is not supposed to have any handguns.
Posted by ramy on June 30, 2008 4:33 PM
As the mother of two young children, I am so afraid of the world that my kids are growing up in--guns play a major role in that fear. Our attitude guns says so much about our culture.
Posted by  on June 30, 2008 3:32 PM
Call it a happy middle ground. What the right is cheering about, and what the left is cheering about, are two different things.

*The right, as you have noticed, is cheering that they basically get to keep their guns.
*The left is cheering that there's a limit to that right; that yes, you get to have a gun, but no, you don't get to walk around town brandishing an Uzi or anything like that. (I'm exaggerating a bit, but you get the idea.)

And to be fair, as for what the Founding Fathers would think, I know they wouldn't be at all happy about the Virginia Tech incident, but Thomas Jefferson himself once said "God forbid we should ever be 20 years without such a rebellion" (referring to the Whiskey Rebellion). I think they'd be more angry we weren't using the guns for what they envisioned us using them for. Maybe in protest to Vietnam, or Watergate, or even the current administration they'd think it acceptable... but not to shoot up a college.
Posted by pete on June 30, 2008 12:57 PM
Yeah, it's disturbing how defiant gun owners are. Don't you wish they would be more passionate about books over guns? I'll join your militia Lisa!
RSS Feed
Add a comment
Name
E-mail
E-mail
Password