I hope this site becomes a place for dialogue and the exchange of ideas. I want to raise consciousness about issues and stories that don't always make the headlines. I believe that global awareness makes a person smarter and ultimately more human. I'm grossed out by what some "news" outlets masquerade as news. It seems that so many of these outlets cover international stories only when there's catastrophe or war. It's a shame.

There are so many fascinating people doing important things out there. As a journalist I've been blessed with the opportunity to travel all over the world. I want this to be a place for everyone to find out about people and organizations that I've encountered that are doing good work. I'd like to share some of my experiences and invite all of you to share your thoughts and stories you think should be told. Let's expand our horizons together!

North Korea
A trip to one of the most isolated countries on the planet
Child Trafficking: India
In India, there are millions of children who are being forced to work as slaves.
Inside Maximum Security
Unprecedented access to SAC -- a maximum-security men's prison.
Female Suicide Bombers
Increasingly, women are using their bodies to deliver an attack.
Meth: The World's Most Dangerous Drug
An exploration the impact meth is having on societies in Portland, Omaha and Bangkok
Click for more topics 
Blog Archive
There is certainly no shortage of issues that should demand our attention, but here’s a list of some that I think are of vital importance. Please share with me your thoughts on these and issues that are of concern to you.
start new topic
1
Topics
Latest Post
latest post by
10/20/2008 at 2:59am
latest post by
10/19/2008 at 2:42am
latest post by
10/10/2008 at 7:24pm
latest post by
10/02/2008 at 10:26am
start new topic
1
RSS Feed
September 06, 2008 3:00 AM  (go back to main view)
McCain

After several days of ceaseless vitriol and incorrigible fear mongering, John McCain’s acceptance speech at the RNC came as a refreshingly collaborative surprise. I was, frankly, disgusted by the insidious mudslinging and character assassination that took place in the preceding days and hours before his address. I found most of the chosen speakers to embody the worst of what America has to offer: arrogance, condescension and close-mindedness. For the most part, I thought McCain delivered a most civilized address.


Contrary to the right wing attack dog that he chose as his VP candidate--the idea of a “pit bull” with or without lipstick in the Oval Office, terrifies me—I was impressed with McCain’s overtures to reach across party lines and even stand up to those zealots within his own party. I don’t dislike McCain, I think he’s probably a decent man. I know that he is not an extension of Bush, but his hawkish position on everything from Russia to Iran does scare me. And do we really need to argue over who’s more patriotic…must we resort to such sophomoric behavior?

Now, more than ever, we need a diplomat. Enough arrogance and tough talk--it’s obviously not working. Our military is grossly overtaxed and our economy is in turmoil. We simply can’t maintain this bravado and think that it’s not going to have terrifying consequences.

I got chills hearing “drill baby drill!” In fact, I’m haunted by it. What about chanting “conserve baby conserve!” Our reliance on foreign oil is growing increasingly perilous. No one denies that off shore drilling will provide a temporary fix, but what about simultaneously investing in ways to alleviate our dependence on both?

As Americans, we need to wake up and start accepting responsibility for our gluttony. The last eight years have been a disaster and anyone who doesn’t blame greed and bravado is fooling himself or herself. Might it be time to take a more humble approach? Could it be worth a shot?

Post Tags:
Related Posts:
We'll be right back.(64 days ago - 31 Comments)
Please check out the following link...(79 days ago - 4 Comments)
Greetings from Alaska!(83 days ago - 7 Comments)
Conscious eating...(87 days ago - 25 Comments)
Still here!(94 days ago - 11 Comments)
Blog Comments (14):
Posted by  on October 17, 2008 5:02 AM
Dear Lisa,
Vote suppression worries me, I so wish you would go on Oprah and give it the attention it deserves. Acorn is being falsely smeared. Most voters don't have a clue what they are up against and won't until it's too late. Americans need to be educated and there is so little time left.
Brad from Brad Blog is excellent, as is Bev Harris at Black Box Voting. It would be criminal if voter suppression (and outright theft) changed the results of this election.
I am not alone in being afraid that it will.

I hope your site doesn't go down, your work is too important.
Thanks for all you do.

Here is what Palast sent me tonight:

ROLLING STONE: IT'S ALREADY STOLEN

Investigation by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Greg Palast released today

Don’t worry about Mickey Mouse or ACORN stealing the election. According to an investigative report out today in Rolling Stone magazine, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Greg Palast, after a year-long investigation, reveal a systematic program of "GOP vote tampering" on a massive scale.

- Republican Secretaries of State of swing-state Colorado have quietly purged one in six names from their voter rolls.

Over several months, the GOP politicos in Colorado stonewalled every attempt by Rolling Stone to get an answer to the massive purge - ten times the average state's rate of removal.

- While Obama dreams of riding to the White House on a wave of new voters, more then 2.7 million have had their registrations REJECTED under new procedures signed into law by George Bush.

Kennedy, a voting rights lawyer, charges this is a resurgence of 'Jim Crow' tactics to wrongly block Black and Hispanic voters.

- A fired US prosecutor levels new charges - accusing leaders of his own party, Republicans, with criminal acts in an attempt to block legal voters as "fraudulent."

- Digging through government records, the Kennedy-Palast team discovered that, in 2004, a GOP scheme called "caging” ultimately took away the rights of 1.1 million voters. The Rolling Stone duo predict that, this November 4, it will be far worse.

There's more:

- Since the last presidential race, "States used dubious 'list management' rules to scrub at least 10 million voters from their rolls."

Among those was Paul Maez of Las Vegas, New Mexico - a victim of an unreported but devastating purge of voters in that state that left as many as one in nine Democrats without a vote. For Maez, the state's purging his registration was particularly shocking - he's the county elections supervisor.

The Kennedy-Palast revelations go far beyond the sum of questionably purged voters recently reported by the New York Times.

"Republican operatives - the party's elite commandos of bare-knuckle politics," report Kennedy and Palast, under the cover of fighting fraudulent voting, are "systematically disenfranchis[ing] Democrats."

The investigators level a deadly serious charge:

"If Democrats are to win the 2008 election, they must not simply beat McCain at the polls - they must beat him by a margin that exceeds the level of GOP vote tampering."

Block the Vote by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. & Greg Palast in the current issue (#1064) of Rolling Stone. [Media enquiries - Dave Falkenstein, Sunshine Sachs & Assoc, via interviews@gregpalast.com.]

Note - Kennedy and Palast are releasing, simultaneously with the Rolling Stone investigative report what they call, the vote-theft 'antidote': a 24-page full-color comic book, Steal Back Your Vote, which can be downloaded or obtained in print from their non-partisan website, StealBackYourVote.org

For updates and video reports, go to RollingStone.com, www.GregPalast.com and StealBackYourVote.org.
Posted by  on September 12, 2008 5:06 PM
I had tremendous respect for McCain when he ran as real Maverick in 2000. He unfotunately sold his soul in 2004 by vigorously campaigning with/and for George Bush to get re-elected. It was his impassioned stump speeches on behalf of Bush that appealed to many independents which was crucial in re-electing George Bush and getting our country into an even deeper mess!!

So, how can he really change something, he fought so hard to make happen?!

No matter how much he wants to be the Maverick from 2000, he cannot run away from the man he worked so hard to re-elect.
Posted by Jane on September 15, 2008 11:18 PM
What the Republicans are doing to keep people from voting (usa )
-------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------
Reply to: comm-841772293@craigslist.org [?]
Date: 2008-09-15, 2:38PM EDT

I thought you should be aware of what the Republicans are doing in Michigan! www.msfraud.org for information and stumbled on this over the weekend! I think this dirty pool needs to be made national.
www.msfraud.org
09/10/08 at 08:25 PM #1
________________________________________
Lose your house, lose your vote
By Eartha Jane Melzer 9/10/08 6:42 AM
Michigan Republicans plan to foreclose African American voters
The chairman of the Republican Party in Macomb County Michigan, a key swing county in a key swing state, is planning to use a list of foreclosed homes to block people from voting in the upcoming election as part of the state GOP’s effort to challenge some voters on Election Day.
“We will have a list of foreclosed homes and will make sure people aren’t voting from those addresses,” party chairman James Carabelli told Michigan Messenger in a telephone interview earlier this week. He said the local party wanted to make sure that proper electoral procedures were followed.
State election rules allow parties to assign “election challengers” to polls to monitor the election. In addition to observing the poll workers, these volunteers can challenge the eligibility of any voter provided they “have a good reason to believe” that the person is not eligible to vote. One allowable reason is that the person is not a “true resident of the city or township.”
The Michigan Republicans’ planned use of foreclosure lists is apparently an attempt to challenge ineligible voters as not being “true residents.”
One expert questioned the legality of the tactic.
“You can’t challenge people without a factual basis for doing so,” said J. Gerald Hebert, a former voting rights litigator for the U.S. Justice Department who now runs the Campaign Legal Center, a Washington D.C.-based public-interest law firm. “I don’t think a foreclosure notice is sufficient basis for a challenge, because people often remain in their homes after foreclosure begins and sometimes are able to negotiate and refinance.”
As for the practice of challenging the right to vote of foreclosed property owners, Hebert called it, “mean-spirited.”
GOP ties to state’s largest foreclosure law firm
The Macomb GOP’s plans are another indication of how John McCain’s campaign stands to benefit from the burgeoning number of foreclosures in the state. McCain’s regional headquarters are housed in the office building of foreclosure specialists Trott & Trott. The firm’s founder, David A. Trott, has raised between $100,000 and $250,000 for the Republican nominee.
The Macomb County party’s plans to challenge voters who have defaulted on their house payments is likely to disproportionately affect African-Americans who are overwhelmingly Democratic voters. More than 60 percent of all sub-prime loans — the most likely kind of loan to go into default — were made to African-Americans in Michigan, according to a report issued last year by the state’s Department of Labor and Economic Growth.
Challenges to would-be voters
Statewide, the Republican Party is gearing up for a comprehensive voter challenge campaign, according to Denise Graves, party chair for Republicans in Genessee County, which encompasses Flint. The party is creating a spreadsheet of election challenger volunteers and expects to coordinate a training with the regional McCain campaign, Graves said in an interview with Michigan Messenger.
Whether the Republicans will challenge voters with foreclosed homes elsewhere in the state is not known.
Kelly Harrigan, deputy director of the GOP’s voter programs, confirmed that she is coordinating the group’s “election integrity” program. Harrigan said the effort includes putting in place a legal team, as well as training election challengers. She said the challenges to voters were procedural rather than personal. She referred inquiries about the vote challenge program to communications director Bill Knowles who promised information but did not return calls.
Party chairman Carabelli said that the Republican Party is training election challengers to “make sure that [voters] are who they say who they are.”
When asked for further details on how Republicans are compiling challenge lists, he said, “I would rather not tell you all the things we are doing.”
Vote suppression: Not an isolated effort
Carabelli is not the only Republican Party official to suggest the targeting of foreclosed voters. In Ohio, Doug Preisse, director of elections in Franklin County (around the city of Columbus) and the chair of the local GOP, told The Columbus Dispatch that he has not ruled out challenging voters before the election due to foreclosure-related address issues.
Hebert, the voting-rights lawyer, sees a connection between Priesse’s remarks and Carabelli’s plans.
“At a minimum what you are seeing is a fairly comprehensive effort by the Republican Party, a systematic broad-based effort to put up obstacles for people to vote,” he said. “Nobody is contending that these people are not legally registered to vote.
“When you are comprehensively challenging people to vote,” Hebert went on, “your goals are two-fold: One is you are trying to knock people out from casting ballots; the other is to create a slowdown that will discourage others,” who see a long line and realize they can’t afford to stay and wait.
Challenging all voters registered to foreclosed homes could disrupt some polling places, especially in the Detroit metropolitan area. According to the real estate Web site RealtyTrac, one in every 176 households in Wayne County, metropolitan Detroit, received a foreclosure filing during the month of July. In Macomb County, the figure was one household in every 285, meaning that 1,834 homeowners received the bad news in just one month. The Macomb County foreclosure rate puts it in the top three percent of all U.S. counties in the number of distressed homeowners.
Wayne, Oakland, Macomb, Kent and Genessee counties were — in that order — the counties with the most homeowners facing foreclosure, according to RealtyTrac. As of July, there were more than 62,000 foreclosure filings in the entire state.
Joe Rozell, director of elections for Oakland County in suburban Detroit, acknowledged that challenges such as those described by Carabelli are allowed by law but said they have the potential to create long lines and disrupt the voting process. With 890,000 potential voters closely divided between Democratic and Republican, Oakland County is a key swing county of this swing state.
According to voter challenge directives handed down by Republican Secretary of State Terri Lynn Land, voter challenges need only be “based on information obtained through a reliable source or means.”
“But poll workers are not allowed to ask the reason” for the challenges, Rozell said. In other words, Republican vote challengers are free to use foreclosure lists as a basis for disqualifying otherwise eligible voters.
David Lagstein, head organizer with the Michigan Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN), described the plans of the Macomb GOP as “crazy.”
“You would think they would think, ‘This is going to look too heartless,’” said Lagstein, whose group has registered 200,000 new voters statewide this year and also runs a foreclosure avoidance program. “The Republican-led state Senate has not moved on the anti-predatory lending bill for over a year and yet [Republicans] have time to prey on those who have fallen victim to foreclosure to suppress the vote.”

source
http://www.michiganmessenger.com/4076/lose-your-ho use-lose-your-vote

blog comments powered by Disqus
CATEGORIES AND TAGS IN THIS
Trott and Trott, Club For Growth pulling the strings on Walberg?


Location: usa
it's NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interests
PostingID: 841772293
Posted by Bill Sande... on September 09, 2008 6:37 PM
Oops, hit post to soon. The point is, the Repubs are spitting the same old tactics: scare people and claim you are more patriotic than your opponents. How offensive is their "Country First" slogan! It should read "We care about the flag and the Democrats don't!". Obama has it right when he says, "we all care about country. Let's talk about issues." My fear is that while this is noble, it isn't effective. I'm deeply concerned about the momentum of the election. Let's hope truth prevails. Stay safe Lisa!!
Posted by James on September 09, 2008 6:35 PM
I believe that McCain's platform on energy reform is to both expand oil drilling in the US and to explore alternative forms of energy such as wind, solar, natural gas, nuclear, hydrogen cells, etc. To say that all McCain is saying to do is drill for oil is a bit unfair. His actual energy policy is following what Boon Pickens has been suggesting, drilling for oil but at the same time gradually switching over to natural gas while we explore other alternative energy sources. Right now we don't have the technology to just get off oil so we need an intermediate short term fix while we perfect the technologies needed and expanding oil drilling at home is that short term fix.
From what I can see on the other side of the aisle is that they want to create regulations to make people conserve yet they are against expanding our own abilities to drill for oil at home. These are the same people that in the 80's and 90's fought to stop us from developing nuclear power in this country which we can see now was a huge mistake.
One other thing, if I had to trust one person to be President that would keep us from going to war unless absolutely necessary that person would be John McCain. The man absolutely despises war because he has seen the horrors of it first hand. Anyone that has been in the military and has been in a battle type situation never wants to be in that situation again and definitely does not want to send someone else in their place unless they have to.
Posted by  on September 09, 2008 7:31 PM
"if I had to trust one person to be President that would keep us from going to war unless absolutely necessary that person would be John McCain. The man absolutely despises war because he has seen the horrors of it first hand. Anyone that has been in the military and has been in a battle type situation never wants to be in that situation again and definitely does not want to send someone else in their place unless they have to."

I don't know if I believe that. A guy like McCain is what I would call a soldier-for-life-- someone who, whatever they went through during war, identify with the military so strongly that it shapes their thinking for the rest of their lives. My dad, a Vietnam veteran himself (he achieved Sharpshooter rank if that means anything and came just short of Sniper), is the same way. He just did the one tour in Vietnam, but to this day he tends to view most of life in a military context. Most of what he watches on TV are war movies and documentaries, his social organizations all revolve around the Marines, even down to the dinner table when he'll mix his food up into some barely-recognizable slop and when asked about it, tell us about what they used to serve in the mess hall. I don't even ask him about his views on torture anymore because they're colored by the 'the guy who cut my hair ended up shooting my buddy'-type thinking he went through back then.

For soldiers-for-life like my dad and McCain, the war never truly ends. When one gets into a position of power, a soldier-for-life tends to end up thinking of his underlings/constituents/etc., on some level, as his troops to be 'drafted' and commanded at his will. And they will only accept total victory. Surrender is not in their vocabulary unless it's the other guy saying it, and then it's the only word that will make a soldier-for-life stop bombing. From the eras soldiers-for-life tend to come from even today, to them losing war means losing land, losing your nation's very sovreignity, and above all dying in vain. And they will aboid letting any of those things happen at all costs.

So... I don't think McCain would keep us out of war. I think he indeed despises war, but only in the context that it happened to him. Otherwise, I think he views war as something that must happen and that must be won no matter what the cost.
Posted by Bill Sande... on September 09, 2008 6:24 PM
Brilliant analysis Lisa. We are in such a critical time in our history, the outcome of this election will impact our future perhaps more than any other election. We are at a crossroads with two dramatically different possible outcomes.
Posted by  on September 09, 2008 12:29 AM
"Drill baby drill"

I cracked up when I heard this at the convention. Not because of the policy, just from their choice of wording.
Posted by Ronald P on September 06, 2008 10:50 AM
This is getting scary. That RNC--Guiliani and Romney were ultra nationalists! What are we thinking?
Posted by Lisa Ling on September 06, 2008 2:44 AM
mtvcdm, do you really work at Wal-Mart? Because you should be running for President. Seriously. Great points that you make, thank you.
Posted by  on September 06, 2008 10:12 AM
23 years old. Can't even run for the House yet.
Posted by  on September 09, 2008 3:50 PM
mtvcdm...I commend you for your hope and clarity
Posted by  on September 06, 2008 2:37 AM
The problem with blaming oneself is very simple, Lisa: it's uncomfortable. People hate to admit failure. (Hell, I'm stuck in a job at Wal-Mart that's getting increasingly out of my realm of physical ability, I'm not even making $8 an hour for it, I probably should have quit months ago, and I have this stupid sense of pride where I somehow refuse to say enough is enough.) If you ask people to admit their own fault, all you'll get is pushback. "I'M not to blame, THAT guy's to blame! Who do you think you are telling me it's my fault?!"

The proper way to do it is to set the goal you want, then challenge people to meet it within a certain timeframe. The mission to the moon was a good example of this. People hate blaming themselves, but they love a good challenge. (In a federal-policy sense, don't make the timeframe more than 10 years; otherwise you're just going to see people raid the fund for the project to finance pet projects in their districts, and then the big project won't get done.)

The object, therefore, is not to ask people to accept responsibility. The object is to figure out a goal that's just ba-a-a-arety reachable, and give people 10 years to get there. Do several of them, in fact. Mass-market cars that don't run on gasoline. If they do run on gasoline, set a goal of 60 mph for a company's entire fleet or something high like that. Desalinization and water conservation to the point where the Sun Belt has enough water to leave the Great Lakes alone. And, of course, cap and trade for carbon emissions.
Posted by Pat on September 06, 2008 2:31 AM
Who is the real McCain? For that matter, who is the real Obama? One can only hope that they are wavering on their ideals for the election. McCain is the an ultra conservative and Obama is neither an ultra liberal. We do need to stop this arrogant behavior though. McCain loves his country...does that qualify someone to be President? Come on!
RSS Feed
Add a comment
Name
E-mail